Showing posts with label Catholic Church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholic Church. Show all posts

Monday, February 4, 2013

Sins of the Fathers

When I was growing up in the protective but ominous shadow of the Catholic Church, the only abuse I suffered was at the hands of the female teachers. Although they were all strict, most of them were generally decent even when galloping senility made their tempers as short as their memories. The exceptions were Sister Joel, my fifth grade teacher who was a dead ringer for "The Church Lady," the character played by Dana Carvey on Saturday Night Live in the early '90s. This nun, whose favorite word was "provoke" ("Why must you always provoke me?"), was often physically violent. Sometimes during her rages, she hurled a book across the room, once nearly knocking a girl’s eye out. But her preferred weapon was the wooden pointer that I remember she smacked me around with once when I failed to understand an arithmetic problem. I also remember Sister Clemensine (seventh grade) who accused me of “snuffing” glue at a time when I was still a virgin to nicotine, and the two “lay” teachers, Miss E and Miss S, both extremely obese single women who delighted in humiliating the male students, probably because neither of them were ever going to get laid.

The priests were the good guys, likeable chaps who outranked the nuns and might even be counted on to protect us from them. Father M, the youngish priest who joined my local parish when I was in seventh grade, was a jerk whose cocky attitude suggested he watched TV cop shows more than he read the Bible, but the other priests - Fathers Carl, Rebal, and the grand old man of the parish, Father Wencenslaus A. Uhlir (a friend of mine and I used to joke that the A probably stood for Archie), were kind, gentle men. Father Uhlir liked the ladies, at least that was the rumor, maybe because his eyes bulged when he looked at them. He had eyes that bulged, however, so that didn’t necessarily mean the women inspired a bulge in his pants.

There was never the slightest suspicion, however, that any of the priests had a thing for children, but in the past decade the Catholic Church has been rocked by a long parade of charges that priests have been sexually molesting young boys. Last month in Philadelphia, a jury convicted a priest and a parochial school teacher on sexual abuse charges brought on by a 24-year-old man who claimed he had been molested years earlier when he was an altar boy. A second priest had been convicted earlier and is already doing prison time. This is just the tip of the iceberg, or should I say the church steeple?

Americans, so naive about sexual matters even as they are obsessed with them, have offered some possible solutions. The most popular is the most bizarre: forget the vow of celibacy and let priests marry.

Who do these people think a priest with a yen for children should marry?

A 10-year-old boy?

Or do they believe pedophilia can be cured by fixing up the pedophile with a grown woman?

© 2013 Brian W. Fairbanks

VISIT MY KINDLE STORE AT AMAZON

Friday, January 11, 2013

Nature or Nurture?

On this, my 90th birthday (or so my aching bones suggest), I could think about the many things that went wrong in my life, but instead I'll be positive and think about what went wrong in the lives of others.

Nature or nurture?

Which defines a person's character?

Is it a little of both?

The question comes to mind after spending a couple of hours searching through the court docket at a county web site. Type in a name and you get the criminal history of county residents. So many of the people with whom I crossed paths in my youth, often as classmates in Catholic school, have criminal records, and a number of them have died of something other than natural causes.

Dennis D. (last name withheld to discourage lawsuits from survivors), the ferret-faced loser who tried to sell me some catnip for a dollar back in 1971 (claiming it was marijuana), spent several years in a "correctional facility" after two different drug busts. He was apparently selling drugs in the vicinity of a schoolyard when he was arrested in 1999. He was about to begin another period of incarceration when, on May 31, 2000, "the court being notified of the death of the defendant, and being satisfied of the truth thereof. . ."

Well, it's hard to prosecute a corpse, so Dennis, at age 43, left this earthly realm to face a more fearsome judge in the hereafter. The cause of death was not available but I assume drugs were involved there, too.

Mark M. was the younger brother of a kid who died in 1970 at age 16 after he caught fire while simultaneously smoking a cigarette and siphoning gas from a car. (Brains were not abundant in the “hood” of my youth.) On February 9, 1994, the kid brother, obviously having failed to learn from his older sibling’s mistakes, was facing charges of felonious assault. He, too, avoided time in a correctional facility when "the court being notified of the death of the defendant, and being satisfied of the truth thereof. . ."

Like Dennis D., Mark M. exited this world for one in which the judgment is truly final.

And there are others. . .

Billy H. went up in flames at age 27 in 1982, not long after he was released from a "correctional facility" where he had been sent after inserting a knife into someone’s gut. Upon his release, unemployed and without prospects, he moved into his parents’ garage. On a crisp October night, a fire broke out. The suspicion was that he was either asleep or simply too high to notice the fire, which probably resulted from the careless smoking of an illegal substance. There was a certain poetic justice in his fate. As a teenager, he was notorious for setting off fire alarms. Now, the fire department was notified too late to save him, and he died, of smoke inhalation, at a hospital less than a quarter of a mile from his home.

I became acquainted with Billy H. through John S. who acquired the nickname of Hardy due to his resemblance, in weight only, to Stan Laurel’s on-screen partner. I had known him since third grade when he followed me home from school and pestered me into a relationship that continued through high school. A classic “latch-key kid,” his mother worked and his father was a drunk. The father was also a bully, and John S. was a bully who later became a drunk. It’s as if he was handed a script at birth and followed it faithfully, having been too unimaginative to improvise.

“How come you're not a drunk like me?" he asked when I saw him for the last time two years before he reached his expiration date. "You lived the same way I did."

I never lived the way he did. My "best friend" never realized that when I reluctantly accompanied him in wandering the streets and, later, hung out at the playground where he had found a home and family with the thugs who loitered there, I was merely physically present, an observer in his life. A quiet, self-contained lad, I would have preferred to stay home and read, write, draw, watch movies, etc. I savored my solitude and needed no companion other than my imagination. True, I seemed to have lived the way he did. When in the company of the "friends" of my youth, I did as they did. I drank beer, I occasionally smoked dope, and listened to the music they favored (Black Sabbath, Aerosmith, Hawkwind). But I only drank ONE beer, two at most, while my companions downed one after another and encouraged me to do the same.

"He sips his beer," John S. would point out.

"Gulp it!" he'd say before gulping his Colt 45 to demonstrate the technique.

But I didn't "gulp." I defiantly "sipped." Once I got home, I returned to my life which I shared with no one.

John S.’s fate was sealed from the beginning. When I learned he had been found dead at age 35 in a room in the house of a friend (for which he could never pay rent), I was neither surprised nor saddened. I remembered how, following the death of a 12-year-old girl in seventh grade, he would chuckle as he lowered his head in mock solemnity when passing her house. When I once expressed the wish to be cremated when I died, he sneered and asked, “Who’d want your ashes?” Now he was cremated, his ashes dumped, per his request, on the playground that represented his only true home. His death also went unnoticed since no one bothered to pay the fee for a newspaper death notice. What a man sows, surely he shall reap. John S. sowed nothing but misery, and he met a miserable end.

I know little about the home lives of the others who met premature and unnatural ends, but, like me, they all came from working class families and were raised in the foreboding shadow of the Catholic Church. Lord knows I’m far from perfect, but I’ve never been arrested, I’m not a drunk, and I find nothing amusing about the death of a child. Oh, and I’m still alive, if not that lively.

Nature?

Nurture?

A little of both?

Are some people just born assholes?

© 2013 Brian W. Fairbanks

VISIT MY KINDLE STORE AT AMAZON